Dismissed

K. Saradamma, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC19 Jun 2024WP/11755/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a writ petition filed under Article 226 and Section 151 CPR as infructuous upon the counsel representing the petitioner's submission that no cause survived. The petition sought writ of mandamus and direction to register documents without insisting on iris and thumb impression.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as infructuous without costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions closed.

K. Saradamma, Vs The State of Andhra… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Andhra Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATIv' (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 11755 OF 2024 -

¶7

Between:

¶8

K. Saradamma, C/o K. V. Siva Shankara Rao (Late), Aged about 94 years, R/o 4/197, Sixth Cross, First Road Anantapur Mandal and District, Andhra Pradesh.

¶9

... Petitioner

¶10

AND

¶11

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principle Secretary, ReveViue Department Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi Amaravathi,^{GunturDistrict.}

¶12

The Inspector General for Stamps and Registration, Tadepalli, Guntur District.

¶13

The District Register, Anantapur, Ananthapur District.

¶14

The Sub - Register-1, Anantapur District.

¶15

... Respondents

¶16

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direct particularly^{oneinthenatureof} Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 4th respondent not receiving the documents presented by the petitioner property situated in Sy.

¶17

¶18

N0.129/2A plot No.87 an extent of Ac. 0.03 Cents situated at kurgunta village, Anantapur Mandal and District is illegal, arbitrary an unconstitutional being violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 4th respondent to receive,^{registerandreleasethe} document presented by the petitioner in favour of the^{thirdpartyforthe} property in Sy. No. 129/2A plot No.87 and extent of^{Ac.0.03Centssituated} at kurgunta village, Anantapur Mandal and District^{withoutinsistingforiris} and thumb impression in the interest of justid^

¶19

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶20

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstances} stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4*^ respondent to receive, register & release the document presented by the petitioner in favour of the^{thirdpartyforthe} property in Sy. No. 129/2A plot No. 87 an extent of^{Ac0.03Centssituated} at kurgunta village, Anantapur Mandal & District without^{insistingforiris&} thumb impression in the interest of justice.

¶21

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI J U M V PRASAD

¶22

Counsel for Respondent No.1: GP FOR REVENUE

¶23

Counsel for Respondents No.2 to 4: GP FOR STAMPS &^REGISTRATION

¶24

The Court made the following:

¶25

I ^

¶26

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH: AMARAVATI

¶27

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI

¶28

WRIT PETITION No.11755 of 2024:

¶29

K.Saradamma, C/o K.V.Siva Shankara Rao (late), Aged about 94 years, R/o 4/197, Sixth Cross, First Road, Anantapur Mandal & District, Andhra Pradesh.

¶30

... Petitioner

¶31

Versus

¶32

The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District and three others. ... Respondents

¶33

Counsel for the petitioner : Sri JUMV Prasad Counsel for respondents GP for Revenue and GP for Stamps & Registration

¶34

Counsel for respondents

¶35

:: ORDER ::

¶36

! t

¶37

' Smt.Ramanisri K.V., learned counsel representing Sri J.U.M.V.Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner^submits that no cause survives in the writ petition and rendered infructuous.

¶38

Recording the above submission, the writ petition is^dismissed as-infructuous. No costs.

¶39

As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- M. PRABHAKAR RAO //TRUE COPY// ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

To,

SE^fON OFFICER

One CC to SRI. JUMV PRASAD Advocate [OPUC]

¶44

Two CCS to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh [OUT]

¶45

Two CCs to GP FOR STAMPS & REGISTRATION, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]

¶46

Three CD Copies.

¶47

NAP, NF Section

¶48

¶49

HIGH COURT DATED:20/06/2024

¶50

ORDER

¶51

WP.No.11755 of 2024

¶52

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOS WITHOUT COSTS

K. Saradamma, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K. Saradamma, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yandrathi Shiva Kumari, Vs The Prohibition and Excise Superintendent

M/s. Partha Restaurant and Bar, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its

M/s Sai Srinivasa Restaurant and Bar, Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh

Peruboyina Kotaiah Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

Mopuri Naidu Vs Union of India

P Srinivasulu Setty Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh