Petitioner submits that the cause no longer survives. The High Court dismisses the Writ Petition as infructuous and closes pending interlocutory applications.
Writ Petition dismissed as infructuous; interlocutory applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
APHC010012602015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
[3310]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 38733/2015
Between:
Kudumula Bala Venkata Reddy, S/o.k.venkata Reddy,
...PETITIONER
AND
The State Of Andhra Pradesh Rep By Its and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
The Court made the following:
Ms.Ayesha Azma, learned counsel, represented on behalf of Mr.Challa Siva Sankar, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and it has become infructuous.
2
As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall
stands closed.
_____________________________ DR. K. MANMADHA RAO, J.
ARR
3
HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO
Writ Petition No.38733 of 2015
Date: 07.03.2024
ARR
Kudumula Bala Venkata Reddy
The State Of Andhra Pradesh
K Manmadha Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
