Writ petition seeking family pension for deceased husband dismissed as withdrawn by petitioner without costs. Court allowed withdrawal and closed pending petitions.
Petitioner granted permission to withdraw writ petition and dismissed as withdrawn without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JULY i TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR I
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION NO: 10633 OF 2023
Between:
...Petitioner
AND
...Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issup a Writ order or orders, more particularlyone in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.4 in - issuing proceeding vide Lr.No.PAG(A and E)/P9/l/R-307/SP148/2023 02/122, dated 07.03.2023, disentitling the petitioner herein for the pension to be received by her on the account of the death of her husband who worked as Panchayat Secretary and Retired on 30.11.2006, with a short
Jlilw.
m
fall in completing ten years of service, as illegal, arbitrary, in violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and contrary to G.O.Ms.No.286 dated 06.08.2015, and consequently direct the respondents to provide the family pension to the petitioner herein in terms of G.O.Ms.No.286, dated 06.08.2015, by setting aside the proceeding vide Lr.NO.PAG (A & E)/P9/l/R-307/SP148/2023-02/122 dated 07.03.2023, issued by the Respondent No.4 herein to the extent Of disentitling the petitioner herein from receiving family pension.
lA NO: 1 OF 202.^
POtition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to provide the family pension to the petitioner herein in terms of G.O.Ms.No.286, dated 06.08.2015, pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MADHAVA RAO NALLURI
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES - IV Counsel for the Respondents: SMT B.V.APARNA LAKSHMI
The Court made the following order:
h'-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH: AMARAVATI
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION No.10633 of 2023
Maligmpati Lakshamma, W/o. Maligmpati Venkata Ramana Naidu, aged about 60 years, R/o. Turupu Rompidodia Village, Varikuntapadu Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi Village, Tullur Mandal, Guntur Districtand five ethers.
... Respondents Counsel for the petitioner ; Sri Madhava Rao Nalluri Counsel for respondents GP for Services - IV and Smt. B. V. APARNA LAKSHMI.
:: ORDER ::
In parsuance. of letter dated 16.07.2024 addressed to the Registrar (Judicial), learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as
withdrawn. No order as to costs.
/■
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- M. SRINIVAS ASSISTANT .REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER
To,
''' -V..
HIGH COURT
DATED:19/07/2024
ORDER
WP.No.10633 of 2023
DISMISSING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mallampati Lakshamma
State of Andhra Pradesh
SUBBA REDDY SATTI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
