Writ appeal against an order in a writ petition concerning land matters. Counsel for the appellant stated the matter had become infructuous; the court recorded the submission and dismissed the appeal as infructuous with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT APPEAL NO: 235 OF 2020
Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent preferredtheorder dt. 14-02-2020 in W.P.No.3363/2020 on the file of the High Court.
Between:
Balaganapathi Yuvajana Sangham, R/o.Madhyapalem, H/o.Ramannapalem Penugonda Mandal West Godavari District Andhra Pradesh.
...APPELLANT/RESPONDENT No.5
AND
...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 1 to 4
lA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in pursuance of the order
dt. 14-02-2020 passed in W.P.No.3363/2020 pending disposaloftheabove writ appeal.
Counsel for the Appellant: SRI TURAGA SAI SURYA ^
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : SRI SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 4 : GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No.5 : SRI N. SRIHARI
SC FOR GRAM PANCHAYAT '
The Court made the following: JUDGMENT
[3488]
APHC010162312020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
Sf^:5
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT APPEAL NO: 235/2020
Between:
Balaganapathi Yuvajana Sangham ...APPELLANT
AND
Gubbala Nageswara Rao and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Appellant:
1.TURAGA SAI SURYA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
I.SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY
2.GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following Judgment: (perHon’ble Sri Justice R Raghunandan Rao)
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the matter has become
infructuous and nothing further survives to adjudicateinthematter.
- Recording the said submission, this Writ Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any shall stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
Sd/- M.RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR
To
/L-3ECTION OFFICER
Cnr
HIGH COURT
DATED:10/09/2024
JUDGMENT WA.No.235 of 2020
i I 2 I SEP 20?^
Section
DISMISSING THE WRIT APPEAL AS INFRUCUTOUS WITHOUT COSTS
Balaganapathi Yuvajana Sangham
Gubbala Nageswara Rao
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Through its Principal Secretary Department of Revenue (Assignment)
The District Collector, West Godavari District
The Tahsildar, Penugonda Mandal
The Ramannapalem Grampanchayat
R Raghunandan Rao
Harinath.N
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
