The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed Writ Appeal No. 1240 of 2023 for default as the appellant failed to appear on the posted dates despite notice. No order as to costs was made.
Writ Appeal dismissed for default with no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT APPEAL NO: 1240 OF 2023
Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent preferred against the order dated 02-11-2022 in W. P. No. 20940 of 2016 on the file of the High Court.
Between:
Kommineni Prakas Rao, S/o. Kotaiah, aged not known, Tangirala Village, Nuzendia Mandal Guntur District.
...APPELLANT/RESPONDENT No.4
AND
...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER
...RESPONDENTS
r
lA NO: 2 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the order dated 02-11-2022 passed in WP No. 20940 of 2016 passed by learned single judge pending disposal of writ appeal.
Counsel for the Appellant: SRI KURUVA NAGANNA
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : SRI V. SURYA KIRANKUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 & 3 : GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following: JUDGMENT
f
1 '/
APHC010546992023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
[3488]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT APPEAL NO: 1240/2023
Between;
Kommineni Prakas Rao
...APPELLANT
AND
Daggupati Venkateswarlu and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Appellant: 1.KURUVA NAGANNA
Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE
2.V SURYA KIRAN KUMAR
The Court made the following Judgment: (per Hon'bleSriJusticeR.RaghunandanRao^
There is no appearance for the appellant on the lastfewoccasionsand no appearance for the appellant today also, despitetheWritAppealbeing posted for dismissal.
Accordingly, this Writ Appeal is dismissed for default.Thereshallbeno order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any,shallstandclosed.
To,
//TRUE COPY//
Sd/- NI RAWIESH BABU deputy registrar K- se6tk3^
- One CC to Sri Kuruva Naganna, Advocate [OPUC]
Cnr
HIGH COURT
DATED:09/09/2024
JUDGMENT
WA.No.1240 of 2023
•v<br>C3<br>mi:
g 2 0 SEP 2024 Co
. Current Section .
DISMISSING THE WRIT APPEAL FOR DEFAULT WITHOUT COSTS
Kommineni Prakas Rao
Daggupati Venkateswarlu
The Revenue Divisional Officer
The District Collector
The State of A.P
R. Raghunandan Rao
Harinath.N
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
