The High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amravati, dismissed Writ Appeal No. 435 of 2023 without costs for default, as the appellant failed to appear despite multiple admissible notices.
Writ Appeal dismissed for default. No order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions to stand closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
'■’i
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI
MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
J.
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
AND
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT APPEAL NO: 435 OF 2023
Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent againsttheorder dated 02.11.2022 in W.P.No.20865 of 2016, on the file of the High Court.
Between:
Kommineni Prakash Rao, S/o. Kotaiah, Aged about 45 years, R/o. Angirala Village, Nuzendia Mandal, Guntur District.
...APPELLANT
AND
...Respondent/Writ Petitioner
...Respondents/ Respondents No.1 to 3
^ Counsel for the Appellant(s): SRI KURUVA NAGANNA
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : SRI V SURYA KIRAN KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondents 2 to 4 : GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010196262023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
[3488]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY. THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT APPEAL NO: 435/2023
Between: Kommineni Prakash Rao, ...APPELLANT
AND Devineni Gopi and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant: 1.KURUVA NAGANNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE
2.V SURYA KIRAN KUMAR
3.SANTHI CHANDRA (Jr. Standing Counsel for CBIC)
The Court made the followingJudgment: (perHon'bleSriJusticeR.RaghunandanRaoj
There is no appearance for the appellant on the lastfewoccasionsand no appearance for the appellant today also, despite the Writ Appeal being posted for dismissal.
Accordingly, this Writ Appeal is dismissed for default.Thereshallbeno order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any,shallstandclosed.
SD/- K. TATA RAO //TRUE COPY// deputy registrar OFFICER
To,
Madhu
HIGH COURT
DATED:09/09/2024
ORDER
WA.No.435 of 2023
aro 13 SFP 202^ CO
DISMISSING THE WA FOR DEFAULT WITHOUT COSTS
Kommineni Prakash Rao
Devineni Gopi
The Revenue Divisional Officer
The District collector
The State of A.P.
R Raghunandan Rao
Harinath.N
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
