This court dismissed Second Appeal No. 94 of 2011 for default due to the non-appearance or lack of representation by the appellant. The interim stay, if any, was vacated with no order as to costs.
The interim stay, if any, is vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI/g*^
(3
FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF JANUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR n Jt),
♦ V
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BANDARU SYAMSUNDER
SECOND APPEAL NO: 94 OF 2011
Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC against the order dated against the decree and Judgment dated 03.08.2009 passed in AS No.225of2005onthefile court of the IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam, confirming the Decree and Judgment, dated 25.02.2005 passed inOSNo.441of1997 on the file of the Court of the III Additional Senior Civil Judge (FTC) Visakhapatnam
Between:
...APPELLANT / APPELLANT /DEFENDANT
AND
Y. Mariyadas and Sons, Rep. by its Partner, Y. Mariyadas R/o D.No. 49-54-8/7, Flat No.3, Swarnajayanthi Residency Balayya Sastry Layout, Sithamadhara, Visakhapatnam-530 013
...RESPONDENT / PLAINTIFF / RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant : SRI. K JAGADISHWAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: SRI. M S R SUBRAHMANYAM
The Court made the following: JUDGMENT
BSS,J S.A.No.94 of 2011
V
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BANDARU SYAMSUNDER
SECOND APPEAL.no. 94 OF 2011
JUDGMENT:
There is no representation for the appellant, thoughmatteris
listed under the caption of Tor dismissal’.
- As there is no representation for the appellants though matter is listed under the caption of Tor dismissal’, this Second
Appeal is dismissed for default. No order as to costs.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. The interim stay granted if any, shall stand vacated.
To,
//TRUE COPY//
SD/-E. KAMESWARA RAO . DEPUTY f^GiSTRAR j
SECTION OFFICER
psr PRK
r* Hi**
t
•HIGH COURT
DATED:12/01/2024
JUDGMENT
SA.No.94 of 2011
§ Copfe
aol3lai^
D5U
DISMISSING THE SECOND APPEAL FOR DEFAULT WITHOUT COSTS
The Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary, Central Public Works Department
The Superintending Engineer, Hyderabad Central
The Chief Engineer, Southern Zone-ll
Y. Mariyadas and Sons, Rep. by its Partner, Y. Mariyadas
Bandaru Syamsunder
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
