The High Court permitted the withdrawal of Civil Revision Petition No. 8 of 2017 based on a compromise between the parties and dismissed the petition as withdrawn without costs.
Permission to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition; Petition dismissed as withdrawn without costs; Interim stay vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
FRIDAY ,THE TWELFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BANDARU SYAMSUNDER
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 8 OF 2017
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to against the orders dated 29-11-2016 passed in R.C.A.No.03of2015TheRent Control Appellate Authority -cum- Principal Senior Civil Judge: Guntur, Guntur in R.C.C. 21/2013 dated 17-11-2014 on the file of Rent Controller -cum- Principal Junior Civil Judge, Guntur.
Between:
Challagundia Srinivasa Rao, S/o Late Dhana Lakshamaiah, Hindu, Bussiness, Aged About 45 years, Hyma Medical Stores, R/o D.No.9-16/6, Station Road, Railpet. Guntur. ...Petitioner/Appellant
AND
(Respondent No’s: 3 & 4 have been brought on recordasLR’sof deceased 1®* Respondent as per Court Order Dated: 02.11.2022 videI.A No. 1 of 2022 in CRP No.8 of 2017).
...Respondents
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(CRPMP. NO: 10 OF 2017)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstancesstatedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order granting permission to deposit the rents in R.C.C. 21/2013 and the file of the Rent Controller Guntur pending disposal of the CRP filed by me on the file this Hon'ble Court.
lA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to bring the respondent Nos. 3 and 4 on record as the legal representatives of the Deceased/1 St Respondent in CRP No. 8/2017.
Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri. Grandhi Gopala Krishna Murthy
Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Virupaksha DattatreyaGouda
The Court made the following:
BSS,J C.R.P.No.8 of 2017
1
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BANDARU SYAMSUNDER
C.R.P.No.8 of 2017
ORDER;
The learned Counsel for the revision petitioner/tenant Mr.Grandhi Gopala Krishna Murthy, represented the case.The learned Counsel Mr.Vivekananda, represented on behalf of Mr.Virupaksha Dattatreya Gouda, learned Counsel for the respondent / landlord. 2. In view of compromise entered between the parties inCRP No.6514 of 2016, the learned Counsel for the revision petitioner/ tenant sought permission to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition. 3. Permitted. 4. The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions if any, shall stand closed. Interim Stay if any, granted shall stand
vacated.
SD/- S SRINIVASA PRASAD ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
HIGH COURT
DATED:12/01/2024
t s
ORDER
CRP.No.8of2017
? Copre.S
55 L
DISMISSING THE CRP AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
Challagundia Srinivasa Rao
Ilapavuluri Lakshmi
Ilapavuluri Adiseshaiah
Hema Nageswari
Bharati
BANDARU SYAMSUNDER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
