MACMA dismissed for default: appellants (APSRTC) had no representation on two consecutive hearing dates and showed no interest in prosecuting the appeal against the Tribunal's award. Miscellaneous applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
V
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V SRINIVAS
MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.2380 of 2017
Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, against the Award and Decree dated 01.03.2017 passed in M.V.O.P No.188 of2016onthe file of the Court of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-l Additional District Judge, Ongole, Prakasam District.
Between:
AND
Respondents 2 and 3 are being minors, represented byGuardianmother1 St respondent herein
...Respondents/Petitioners in OP
...Respondent/Respondent No.3
(The 6“^ respondent is not necessary party in this appeal)
I.A. NO: 2 OF 2017(MACMAMP. NO: 4240 OF 2017)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the Award and Decree dated 01.03.2017 passed in O.P No. 188 of 2016 on the fileoftheCourtoftheMotor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-lst Additional District Judge, Ongole, Prakasam District, including the execution proceedings, pending disposal of the above MACMA.
Counsel for the Appellants
: Sri P Durga Prasad (SC for APSRTC) (no representation)
Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 5: Sri Madhava RaoNalluri
The Court made the following: JUDGMENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS
M A.C.M.A.No.2380 of 2017
JUDGMENT:
On an earlier occasion i.e., 14.11.2024, when the matter was taken up for hearing, there was no representationonbehalf of the appellants and the matter was posted to 21.11.2024under the caption ‘For Dismissal’.
no 2. Even today also when the matter was called, there is representation on behalf of the appellants. It appears that the appellants are not evincing any interest to prosecutetheAppeal.
- Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default. No orderasto costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, ifany.
shall stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
SDI- N NAGAMMA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR <p/' 9V' SECTION OFFICER
To
/•
HIGH COURT
TK
DATED:21/11/2024
JUDGMENT
MACMA.No.2380 of 2017
ANDH^
X 2 0 FEB 2025 s
Current Section
p£s PATCV'^r^
DISMISSING THE MACMA FOR DEFAULT
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, represented by its Managing Director
Depot Manager, APSRTC, Kandukuru Depot
Pothineni Chenchu Lakshmi
Potineni Mallikharjun
Potineni Murali
Pothineni Narasimham
V Srinivas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
