High Court of Andhra Pradesh disposed of a Civil Revision Petition as infructuous because the underlying suit in the trial court was already disposed of.
The Civil Revision Petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
h A
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 650 OF 2024
P6tition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, being aggrieved by the order dated 21-02-2024 in I.A.No. 1 of 2024 ion O.S.No. 79 of 2006 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Madanapalle, Chittoor district Between:
...PETITIONER/ 3'^ PARTY/ PROPOSED D-21
AND
,
(Respondents 8 to 27 are not necessary for the present)
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS /DEFENDANTS
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC, praying that in thecircumstancesstatedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, theHighCourtmaybepleased may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings inO.S.No.79of2006on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Madanapalle,ChittoorDistrict
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI. MAHADEVA KANTHRIGALA
Counsel for the Respondents: SMT. AYESHA AZMA S
The Court made the following: ORDER
[3206]
APHC010140232024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 650/2024
Between:
S. Chan Basha ...PETITIONER
AND
Pujari Ramakrishna and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.MAHADEVA KANTHRIGALA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.AYESHAAZMAS
The Court made the following order:
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits thatthesuitintheTrial Court itself has been disposed of and nothing further survives to adjudicate in the Revision Petition.
Accordingly, the present Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as
infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any shall stand
closed.
//TRUE COPY//
SDI- U SRIDEVI ASSISTAN^ REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER ^
HIGH COURT
DATED: 26/07/2024
ORDER
CRP.No.650 of 2024
DISMISSING THE CRP AS INFRUCTUOUS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present Civil Revision Petition is maintainable in light of the trial suit being disposed of.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
S. Chan Basha
Pujari Ramakrishna and Others
R Raghunandan Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
