Writ petition seeking protection of government land in Divili Village was withdrawn by the petitioner; the Andhra Pradesh High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn with no order as to costs and closed pending interlocutory applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
<sN a ^2 a
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 22181 OF 2012
Between;
Mrs. Godata Laxmi, W/o. Mr. G. Rambabu, Aged about 40 years Occ; Social Worker, R/o. H.No.3-33, DIVILI VILLAGE, Peddapuram Mandal, E.G. Dist.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP. NO: 28442 OF 2012)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.6 not to permittoconstructthehouses in the Survey No. 89/2 and 91 in Divili Village, Peddapuram Mandal, East Godavari District by Respondent No. 8 and 9 other than allottees pending disposal of the above Writ Petition.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WVMP. NO: 1517 OF 2016) Between:
Mr. Naralasetti Surya Rao, S/o. N. Govinda Rajulu, Aged about 55 years Occ: Agril, Divili Village, Peddapuram Mandal, E.G. Dist.
...8"^ RESPONDENT/PETITIONER AND
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS
...PETITIONER/RESPONDENTT/RESPONDENTS
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order granted by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.M.P.No. 28442 of 2012 in W.P.22181 of 2012 dated 23-7-2012 in the interest of justice pending disposal of the above Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. SHAIK MEERAVALI
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 6: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.8: JOSYULA BHASKARA RAO
Counsel for the Respondents: S A RAZAK
The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010057732012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
[3206]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY. NINETEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SR! JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 22181/2012
Between:
Mrs. Godata Laxmi
...PETITIONER
AND The Government Of A P Rep By Principal Secretary and ...RESPONDENT(S) Others Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.SHAIKMEERAVALI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR REVENUE
2.JOSYULA BHASKARA RAO
3.S ARAZAK
The Court made the following order:
In view of the letter dated 16.07.2024, filed by thelearnedcounselfor
petitioner, and in view of the submission made by thelearnedcounsel for petitioner that the petitioner is desirous of withdrawingtheWritPetition,this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shallbenoorderastocosts.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, ifany shall stand closed.
SD/- K.TATATAO DEPUTY\REG1STRAR //TRUE COPY// SE(STt^fTOFFlCER
I
To
r
gi
H-
HIGH COURT
DATED: 19/07/2024
ORDER
WP.No.22181 of 2012
ANOfy]^^
m
5 0 9 AUG 202^ Co
i^^spatcv^
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Mrs. Godata Laxmi
The Government of A.P., rep. by Principal Secretary, Revenue Department
The Inspector General Stamps and Registration Dept.
Sub-Registrar, Peddapuram Sub Registrar Office
District Collector, East Godavari District
Tahsildar, Peddapuram Mandal
R Raghunandan Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
