This Criminal Revision Petition was dismissed by a single judge in Andhra Pradesh for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear and prosecute the matter.
CRP dismissed for non-prosecution without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
MONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2473 of 2074
Petition under Section 115 of CPC, against the orders in E.A.No.285/2003 in E.P.No.82/1987 in O.S.No.32/1966 dated 7.2.2007 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge at Gudivada, Krishna District.
Between:
Vuriti Venkata Sivalingam, S/o. Kotaiah, Hindu, Aged about 70 years. Pensioner, R/o.Bilai.
...PETITIONER
AND
A
...RESPONDENTS
(R3 set Exparte, against R5 E.P. dismissed)
(Therefore R 3 & 5 are not necessary for this CRP)
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI S JAGADISH
Counsel for the Respondents : NONE APPEARED
The Court made the following ORDER :
APHC011348862007
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH 050 AT AMARAVATI 0 (Special Original Jurisdiction)
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[2609]
MONDAY ,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO:
Between;
Vuriti Venkata Sivalingam
...PETITIONER
AND
Surapaneni Venkataramaiah Died And 6 Others
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.S JAGADISH
Counsel for the Respondent;
The Court made the following;
2
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION
ORDER:
Aggrieved by the Order dated 07.02.2007 in E.A.No.285of 2003in E.P.No. 82 of 1987 in O.S.No. 32 of 1966 passed bytheSenior Civil Judge at Gudivada, the present Civil Revision Petitionisfiled.
- When the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the Petitioner. It appears that the petitioner has no interest to prosecute the present Petition.
- Accordingly, the present Civil Revision Petition isdismissed for non prosecution. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
/
SDI- N.NAGAMMA ASSIATANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To
TAG
f
^ I
HIGH COURT DATED:23/09/2024
■■ •*.
ORDER
CRP.No.2473 of 2024
I 01 FEB 2025 3
^ . Current Section . ^
^^^SPATCVA^<^
DISMISSING THE CRP FOR NON PROSECUTION
Vuriti Venkata Sivalingam
Surapaneni Venkataramaiah
Surapaneni Rama Manoham Prasad
Surapaneni Ramanadh Chowdary
Mukkamala Swaruparani
Kaza Soundaraya Rani
NYAPATHY VIJAY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
