Judgment debtor's revision petition against an execution proceedings objection rejection was dismissed after the E.P. was dismissed for default, leaving no surviving cause of action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI IN THE HIGH COURT twenty third day of SEPTEMBER MONDAY, THE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
honourable SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
CIVIL ppx/K^iHM PETITION No j212 of 20.24
CPC against the Order dated 04-10Petition under Section 115 of ^ of 2003 passed by the Court of 2012 in E.P.No.21 of 2006 in O.S. No. 67 West Godavari District. the Senior Civil Judge, Bhimavaram,
Between:
Tirapathi Rayudu, Aged about 55 years, Chinamilli Krishna Murhty, S/o. Mandal, BSCJC, West R/o. Mentepudi, Veeravasaram Occ; Business Godavari District. ...petitioner/respondent/judgment debtor
AND
, Occ: Cultivation Grand! China Appa Rao, s/o. Joguiu, Aged 57 years BSCJC, West Godavari District. R/o. Veeravasaram
...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER/DECREE
HOLDER
; SRI K M R BALA PRASAD REPRESENTING Counsel for the Petitioner : ON BEHALF OF SRI P DURGA PRASAD
: NONE APPEARED Counsel for the Respondent
The Court made the following ORDER .
APHC011458182013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3460] (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2212/2024
Between:
Chinamilli Krishna Murhty
...PETITIONER
AND
Grand! China Appa Rao
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Petitioner;
1.P DURGA PRASAD
Counsel for the Respondent:
The Court made the following:
V
2
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION N0.2212 of 9n7A
ORDER:
- The present Revision filed questioning the order dated 04.10.2012 in E.P.No.21 of 2006 in O.S.No.67 of 2003 passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Bhimavaram, West Godavari District in rejecting the objections of the petitioners/judgmentdebtors. 2. At the time of hearing, it is represented by Sri K.M.R. Bala Prasad, proxy counsel for Sri P. Durga Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner that subsequent to the order impugned,theE.P was dismissed for default on 09.12.2014.
- Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed.
There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- V. SAVITRI GOWRI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To
TAC
6
HIGH COURT
DATE0:23/09/2024
ORDER
CRP.No.2212 of 2024
^ANO„^
o
X 0 6 DEC 202'! Oil'mii
O
^ Current Secuon
^%^esPATCW*S!^
DISMISSING THE CIVIL REVISION PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS
Chinamilli Krishna Murhty
Grandi China Appa Rao
Nyapathy Vijay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
