and that the plaintiffs denied the averment regarding Oppudala Patram, dated 01.02.2009, and further pleaded that under the guise of the said Oppudala Patram, dated 01.02.2009, the defendants had also taken the first floor of the schedule building and the rent has to be adjusted towards interest on the amount of Rs.5,00,000/-. The trial Court further observed that the plaintiffs contended that the lease got automatically cancelled as per the terms of the lease agreement since the defendants failed to pay rents continuously for a period of three (3) months from March, 2020 to May, 2020 and also as a quit notice was issued on 01.07.2020, but in the petition, the plaintiffs sought a direction to the defendants to pay arrears of rents from November, 2020 contrary to the pleadings in the plaint and so when there is no default in payment of rents from March, 2020 to May, 2020, as on the date of filing of the suit, as pleaded in the plaint and in view of the existence of registered lease agreement, whether the suit is maintainable or not is an issue to be decided in the trial as contended in the written statement. The trial Court further observed that there is a rival contention of payment of Rs.6,00,000/- by the 2nd defendant to the plaintiffs , apart from the loan of Rs.4,00,000/- and the same also to be decided in the trial, but not at this stage. The trial Court further observed that the written lease agreement between the parties was not marked in the present petition during enquiry and
