any condition. Therefore, when a blanket order is sought by the appellants, the Court has to consider whether the case falls in exception or not.” 8. Therefore, in the light of above judgments of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, normally, the Appellate Court will be justified in imposing condition of deposit as provided in section148 of N.I.A.ct. However, in a case, whether the Appellate Court issatisfiedwiththe condition of deposit of 20% will be unjust, exceptioncanbemadefor the reason specifically recorded. Hence, when the AppellateCourt considers an application filed U/s.389(1) Cr.P.C. corresponding to Section 430 of BNSS by the drawer of the cheque (accused),whowas convicted for the offence U/s.138 of Negotiable InstrumentsAct,the Appellant Court has to consider whether it is exceptionalcasewhich warrants grant of suspension of sentence without imposingconditionof deposit of 20% of fine/compensation amount. If theAppellateCourt comes to said conclusion that it is an exceptionalcase,reasonsfor coming to such conclusion must be recorded. 9. In the case on hand, the impugned order of the learned Appellate Court does not disclose anything that thelearnedAppellate Court considered whether the cases in the exception or not? i.e..
