Petitioners sought anticipatory bail and stay of proceedings in a criminal case; counsel submitted the main matter was disposed of by the trial Court, leaving nothing to adjudicate. The High Court dismissed the Criminal Petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
MONDAY ,THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 232 OF 2019
Between:
AND
...Respondents/Complainant
Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C praying that inthe circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in CC No.80 of 2015, on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Sullurpet, (crimeNo.125 of 2011 of Station House Officer, Tada Police Station, SPSR Nellore District), in so far as the petitioners/A4 and A9 herein are concerned.
I.A. NO: 2 OF 2019
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that inthecircumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in CC No.80 of 2015, on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Sullurpet, (crime No. 125/2011 of Station House Officer, Tada Police Station, SPSR Nellore District), in so far as the petitioners/A4 and A9 herein are concerned, including arrest and appearance.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusingtheMemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the argumentsofSriVBrahmaiah Chowdary, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1.
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.232 OF 2010
ORDER;
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners would
submit that the main was disposed of by the trial Court. Hence, nothing remains for further adjudication.
In view of the said submission, the present Criminal Petition
is dismissed as infructuous.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pendingin this
Criminal Petition shall stand closed.
SD/- U SRIDEVI
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To,
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
1 The Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Sullurpet,SPSRNehoreDistrict. 2. One CC to Sri V. Brahmaiah Chowdary, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court ofA.P.atAmaravathi[OUT]
HIGH COURT
DATED:12/02/2024
ORDER
CRLP.No.232 of 2019
^Copfes IS 1 D^L
DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Chandolu Sreenivasa Rao
Dara Anandra Rao
The State of Andhra Pradesh
Mr. D. Naveen Seshu
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
