In a criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C seeking quashment of proceedings for abduction, murder and dowry harassment, the High Court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution as the petitioners were not represented despite listing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
f 4 > • j;
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAV THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1932 OF 2021
Between:
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED 2 & 3
AND
...RESPONDENTS/DEFACTO/COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedingsinCC.No.464of 2020, dated on the file of II Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Tanuku. against the Petitioners/Accused 2 and 3 and pass
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusingtheMemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri K. MALLIKARJUNA RAO, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor (AP) on behalf of the Respondent No. and of Sri S. DILIM JAYA RAM, Advocate for the Respondent No.2 The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010110432021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3396] (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1932/2021
Between:
Kompella Surya Lalitha Prasad and Others ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S )
AND State Of Andhra Pradesh and ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) Others
Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
/ J
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
2.S DILIP JAYA RAM
The Court made the following: ORDER:
The instant petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short “Cr.P.C.”) has been filed by the Petitioners/Accused Nos.2 and 3, seeking quashment of the proceedings against them in C.C.No.464 of 2020 on the file of II Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Tanuku, West Godavari District,fortheoffences punishable under Sections 498-A r/w.34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short ‘I.P.C.’) and Sections 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.
2
VJP.J CrI P No.1932 of2021
i .
i
- Despite the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, none represented for the Petitioners.
- The docket proceedings dated 16.04.2024 and 29.04.2024show none represented for the petitioners.
- Ms. D.Prasanna Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing the State/Respondent No.1 is in attendance.
- Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall
stand closed.
SDI- S. SRINIVASA PRASAD ASSISTANT REGISTRAR \y
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
nm
HIGH COURT DATED:02/05/2024
ORDER
CRLP.No.1932 of 2021
-7x
.\o I 3 AUG 202‘| m ■'
Current Section
CRIMINAL PETITION IS DISMISSED FOR NON PROSECUTION
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the proceedings under Sections 498-A IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act should be quashed upon non-prosecution of the petitioners.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Kompella Surya Lalitha Prasad and Others
State of Andhra Pradesh
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
