Criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashment of a revision order confirming an interlocutory order in a pending case. No representation appeared for the petitioners on successive listings; the High Court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution and closed miscellaneous applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
•
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
THURSDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1766 OF 2021
Between:
Mallavaram Village, Maddipadu Mandal, Prakasam District.
...Petitioners
AND
...Respondents
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for records in the Order dated 07-012021 in Criminal Revision Petition (CRP) No.4 of 2018 on the file of the Court of the Sessions, Prakasam Division, at Ongole, Prakasam District
<4
confirming the Order dated 09-01-2018 in CrI.M P. No. 4531 of 2017 in CC No.,^245 of 2016 on the file of the Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class, ^ ^ ExciSi|^,Court, at Ongole, Prakasam District and quash the same allowing above ai.M.P. No. 4531 of 2017 in CC No. 245 of 2016.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in CC No. 245 of 2016 on the file of the Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Excise Court, at Ongole, Prakasam District including pronouncement of the judgment therein, i in the interest of justice, pending disposal of above Criminal Petition.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Gade Venkateswara Rao (no representation for the petitioner), Advocate for the Petitioner and the Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No,2.
The Court made the following ORDER:
APHC010104752021
0^0
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3396]
THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1766/2021
Between:
Ravipati Venu Babu and Others ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S)
Nalamothu Ekambareswara Rao and Others
AND ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
1 GADE VENKATESWARA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1.
The Court made the following;
ORDER:
The instant petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.P.C.”) has been filed by the Petitioners/Accused, seeking for quashment of the Order dated 07.01.2021 against them in Criminal Revision PetitionCRPNo.4of2018 rsf fUz-i fho Qcieoir>nc li f;ig Wl Cl C W kt 1^, Proj^acam DjwicjQn gt Ongo!0 confirming the order dated 09.01.2018 in Crl.M.P.No.4531 of 2017 in
2
' VJ[>,J CrI P No. 766 of 2021 V)
C.C.No.245 of 2016 on the file of Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Excise Court, Ongole, Prakasam District.
- The docket proceedings dated 04.04.2024 and 29.04.2024 show, none represented for the petitioners.
- Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall
stand closed.
SDI- V SAVITHRI GOWRI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
sree
HIGH COURT DATED:02/05/2024
ORDER
CRLP.No.1766 of 2021
-O
o ^SAUS .2
4cr4
vl‘
X
■C--5^-0
■sJ.;
DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITinw for NON-PROSECUTION
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ravipati Venu Babu
Nalamothu Ekambareswara Rao
The State of AP
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
