Contempt case filed for alleged wilful disobedience of orders passed earlier in a writ petition was closed after counsel reported compliance; no further orders or costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3329]
APHC010051022024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY ,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 829/2024
Between:
M.deva Dheeraj Reddy
...PETITIONER
AND
Sri Shashibhushan Kumar and Others ...CONTEMNOR(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.MEKALA ANUSHA Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1.S SIVA KUMARI The court made the following ORDER:
This contempt case is filed against the respondents for wilful disobedience of the orders dated 03.11.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.29727 of 2022.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Ms.Devasri learned counsel representing for the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have complied with the orders dated 03.11.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.29727 of 2022, and hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case.
Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs.
2
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the
contempt case shall stand closed.
____________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J
20.09.2024
klk
3
21
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
(closed)
Contempt Case No.829 of 2024
20.09.2024 klk
1 issue framed by the court
Have the respondents complied with the orders dated 03.11.2023 in W.P.No.29727 of 2022, such that no further contempt proceedings are needed?
M. Deva Dheeraj Reddy
Sri Shashibhushan Kumar
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
