Dismissed

Kumar Swamy Nayak v. M Rama Rao,I.a.S

Andhra Pradesh HC2 Oct 2024CC(AT)/470/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravati, permitted the petitioners counsel to withdraw the contempt case which was subsequently dismissed as withdrawn, closing associated miscellaneous petitions. The case was filed seeking punishment for willful contempt of Tribunal orders. (12 words)

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw is accorded. The Case (AT) is dismissed as withdrawn and miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Kumar Swamy Nayak Vs M Rama Rao,I.a.S — Contempt of Court | Andhra Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI

¶2

THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF OCTOBER

¶3

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CC(AT) NO: 470 OF 2023

¶6

Pleased under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to summon the respondent and punish him for his willful, deliberate and intentionaTContempt of^the final orders of the Hon'ble Tribunal in O.A.No.1102 of 2018 dated 18.12.2018.

¶7

Between:

¶8

Kumar Swamy Nayak, S/o Late Hadia Nayak, Hindu, aged 58 years, Occ. H.W.O (Dismised), R/o 11-55/A, 0pp. Medha School, Old N.H.-5 Road. Kasibugga,Srikakulam District

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

M. Rama Rao,I.A.S, The District Collector, Srikakulam District, (B.C. Welfare), Srikakulam (Town and District)

¶12

...RESPONDENT

¶13

Counsel for the PetitionerSRI KRISHNA MOHAN SIKHARAM Counsel for the Respondent: -—

¶14

The Court made the following:

¶15

¶16

APHC010265102023

¶17

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3459] (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶18

THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶19

PRESENT

¶20

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CONTEMPT CASE TRANSFERED FROM APAT NO: 470/2023

¶21

Between:

¶22

. %

¶23

Kumar Swamy Nayak ...PETITIONER

¶24

AND

¶25

M Rama Rao I A S ...RESPONDENT

¶26

Counsel for the Petitioner;

¶27

KRISHNA MOHAN SIKHARAM

¶28

The Court made the following:

¶29

Order:

¶30

Sri S.Krishna Mohan, learned counsel for the petitioner,^{submittedthat} he addressed a letter to the Registry dated 20.09.2024, which is placed on record, seeking permission of this Court to withdraw this Contempt Case (AT).

¶31

Permission is accorded.

¶32

Accordingly, this Contempt Case (AT) is dismissed as^withdrawn.

¶33

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending^{shallstandclosed.}

¶34

SDI- M. RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

M. Rama Rao.I.A.S, The District Collector, Srikakulam District, (B.C. Welfare), Srikakulam (Town and District)

¶39

One CC to SRI. KRISHNA MOHAN SIKHARAM, Advocate [OPUC]

¶40

Three C.D.Copies nm

¶41

HIGH COURT DATED:03/10/2024

¶42

ORDER CC(AT).No.470 of 2023

¶43

¶44

&
S 1 0 JAN 2025 S'

¶45

DISMISSING THE CC(AT) AS WITHDRAWN

Kumar Swamy Nayak v. M Rama Rao,I.a.S

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kumar Swamy Nayak v. M Rama Rao,I.a.S

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.A. Zilani Vs Sri. S.S. Rawat

S. Md. Riyazuddin Vs Sri Anil Chandra Punitha, IAS

C.Peddanna Vs Sri M.Janardhana Charyulu

R Kondala Rao Vs Sri Neerab Kumar Prasad, IAS

P R Mustafa Khan Vs P S Pradyumna

K Chaitanya Bharathi Vs Praveen Kumar,I.a.S