Contempt case dismissed for default as neither petitioner nor counsel appeared when called; no costs, pending miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3459]
APHC010262912023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CONTEMPT CASE TRANSFERED FROM APAT NO: 331/2023
Between:
P R Mustafa Khan ...PETITIONER
AND
P S Pradyumna
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.B KRISHNA
The Court made the following:
Order:
On 19.09.2024 at request of learned counsel for petitioner, the matter
was directed to be posted on 24.09.2024. Today when the matter is called, there is no representation for the petitioner.
prosecute the case. Therefore, this Contempt Case (AT) is dismissed for
default. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
___________________ SUMATHI JAGADAM,J
Dated: 03.10.2024 NNN
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CONTEMPT CASE TRANSFERED FROM APAT NO: 331/2023
03.10.2024
NNN
P R Mustafa Khan
P S Pradyumna
Sumathi Jagadam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
