Dismissed
Lutukurthi Jagadeesh v. G Ananta Ram
Andhra Pradesh HCCC(AT)/396/2023
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI MONDAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI MONDAY…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
MONDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CONTEMPT CASE TRANSFERED FROM APAT NO: 396 OF 2023
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to summon the all the Respondents here in for their gross disobedience of the order dated 25-04-2018 passedin 0.A.No.617 of 2018 and punish them by sending to them to prison under section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act read with Section 17 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.
Between:
Lutukurthi Jagadeesh, S/o. Sri Narayana Murthy, aged 37 years, Occ. Clerical Assistant/Computer Operator, O/o, The Forest Range Officer, Range No.IV, Paderu of Paderu Division, Visakhapatnam District. Resident of Forest Quarters A.4, Ramana Nagar, Paderu, Visakhapatnam.
...PETITIONER
AND
... RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI P B VIJAYA KUMAR(SC FOR AU)
Counsel for the Respondents : NONE APPEARED
The Court made the following ORDER :
APHC010264222023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3459]
MONDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CONTEMPT CASE TRANSFERED FROM APAT NO: 396/2023
Between:
Lutukurthi Jagadeesh ...PETITIONER
AND
G Ananta Ram and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
The Court made the following:
3
C.C.(AT).No.396 of 2023
ORDER:
As there was no representation for the petitioner on 03.07.2024, 20.07.2024, and 14.08.2024, the matter was directed to be listed on 01.10.2024. On 01.10.2024 also there was no representation for the petitioner, hence, the matter was directed to be listedtodayunderthecaption ‘for dismissal’. Even today, there is no representationforthepetitioner.It appears that the petitioner is not interested to prosecutethecase.
Therefore, this Contempt Case (AT) is dismissed fordefault.Thereshall
be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pendingshallstandclosed.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/- K.TATARAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER
To,
Ssl
TAC
,5t
HIGH COURT
DATED:14/10/2024
ORDER
CC(AT).No.396 of 2023
S 2 9 JAN 2021 I
V ^ Current Section
CONTEMPT(AT) IS DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT.
Lutukurthi Jagadeesh
G Ananta Ram and Others
SUMATHI JAGADAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court