D.Venugopal Rao v. Sri Vikas Marmat, Ias.
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt petition under Sections 10-12 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971 regarding non-implementation of earlier orders, the Court closed the case as the petitioner was absent and the respondents submitted that the orders were complied with.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed without costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 302 OF 2024
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of CourtsAct 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to commit the Respondents for contempt of the Hon'ble Court in not implementing the orders passed in WP.No.1559/2023, dated 24/01/2023 for wantely and intentionally and punish them suitably.
Between:
- D.Venugopal Rao, S/o. Kodanda Ramaiah, aged about 53 years. Work lnspectorGr.il, Nellore Municipal Corporation, Nellore.
- M.Sudhakar Reddy, S/o. Vengal Reddy, aged about 53 years. Work Inspector Grade-11, Nellore Municipal Corporation,Nellore.
- M.Ajantha, D/o. Raghunath Reddy, aged about 52 years. Work Inspector, Nellore Municipal Corporation, Nellore.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt case should be continued given the lack of petitioner representation and respondent's confirmation of compliance.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
D. Venugopal Rao and Others
- respondent
Sri Vikas Marmat
- respondent
G. Srinivasa Rao
- respondent
P. Koteswara Rao
- respondent
Smt. Sri Laxmi
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Andhra Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- CC/302/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court