Petitioner sought punishment for alleged disobedience of a High Court order directing his appointment. Respondents issued proceedings appointing the petitioner as MPHA(M)/Insect Collector on contract basis; the court recorded the compliance and closed the contempt case with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
MONDAY ,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER m
0K o
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
BA
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2861 OF 2024
Contempt case U/s.10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to Punish the Respondents herein for wilfully and violating, disobeyingtheorders of the High Court dated 15.02.2023 in WP No.39952 of 2022
Between:
Karriyavula Pakeeraiah, S/o. K.Pakeeraiah Hindu, aged about 47 years, Occ. Un employee R/o. Padamati Naidu Palli Village, Marripadu Mndal, SPSR Nellore District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI V V PRABHAKARA RAO Counsel for the Respondents : SRI G RAJU The Court made the following ORDER :
APHC010279822024
■■r'%
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3329]
MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2861/2024
Between:
Karriyavula Pakeeraiah
...PETITIONER
AND
M Krishna Babu and Others
...CONTEMNOR(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1.G RAJU
The Court made the following:
/
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2861/2024
ORDER
This contempt case is filed against the respondentsforwillfuldisobedience of the orders dated 15.02.2023 passed by this CourtinW.P.No.39952of2022.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the respondents issued proceedings Rc.No.2570/E2/2019-24 dated 14.11.2024 by appointing the petitioner as MPHA(M)/lnsect Collector in A.P. Medical and Health Services on Contract basis.
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not refusethesame.
In view of the compliance reported by the respondents,nofurtherorders are necessary. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed.Noorderastocosts.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt
case shall stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/- V.DIWAKAR DEPUTY REGI AR SEOTfON OFFICER
To,
HIGH COURT
DATED:25/11/2024
ORDER
CC.No.2861 of 2024
of
X 0 <1 MAR 2r25 I)
^ . Curreni oeciic»n
CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents wilfully disobeyed the orders dated 15.02.2023 in W.P.No.39952 of 2022, and whether compliance has since been effected.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Karriyavula Pakeeraiah
M. Krishna Babu
Dr. K. Padmavathi
M. Harinarayan
K. Penchulaiah
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
