Contempt case alleging wilful disobedience of a writ court order; closed on the petitioner's counsel's submission that the connected writ appeal was partly allowed and no further orders were required.
Contempt case closed with no order as to costs; miscellaneous applications pending, if any, stand closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI [ 3310 ] (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY ,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2030 OF 2023
Between:
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
...CONTEMNORS
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to summon the respondent herein before this Hon'ble Court and punish them for willfully and deliberately disobeying the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No. 6676 of 2020 dated 29- 06-2022 and grant
Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI. KAVITHA GOTTIPATI
Counsel for the Respondents: V K NAIDU
The Court made the following Order:
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Ms.Nirupama,
learned counsel respresenting Ms.Kavitha Gottipati, learned counsel for
the petitioner submits that no further are required to be passed in this
matter as the Writ Appeal was partly allowed and hence, it may be
closed.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall
stand closed.
Dr. K. MANMADHA RAO, J
14th February, 2024 BMS
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Amruthapudi Ashalatha
Praveen Prakash IAS
S Suresh Kumar IAS
K Manmadha Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
