Petitioner's writ petition was dismissed as infructuous as she had been reinstated into service pursuant to a prior interim order, leaving nothing for adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE V. SUJATHA
Writ Petition No.9538 of 2015
ORDER :
When the matter was taken up for hearing today, Mr.M.S.R.Chandra Murthy, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent No.2 has submitted that, in pursuance of the interim order dated 07.04.2015 granted by this Court, the petitioner has been reinstated into service on 23.04.2015. Therefore, nothing survives for further adjudication.
SMT JUSTICE V. SUJATHA
16.03.2023 psr/kbs
2
58
THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE V. SUJATHA
(Dismissed as Infructuous)
Writ Petition No.9538 of 2015
Date: 16.03.2023
Psr/kbs
SMT JUSTICE V. SUJATHA
RESPONDENT NO.2
V. SUJATHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
