Disposed

Vaddu Venkata Reddy v. the State of Ap

Andhra Pradesh HC9 Feb 2023WP/768/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition, the court addressed the petitioner's claim for unpaid contract amounts under the 'Neeru-Chettu' programme. The court directed the respondents to finish verification within three weeks and make payment within six weeks, stipulating automatic payment without further delay if verification is delayed.

What did the court decide?

Directing respondents to complete verification within three weeks and pay dues within six weeks; automatic payment if verification is delayed.

Vaddu Venkata Reddy Vs the State of Ap — Service and Employment | Andhra Pradesh HC (2023)

¶1

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO WRIT PETITION No.768 of 2023

¶2

ORDER:

¶3

The petitioner had been awarded the contract for taking up the “Neeru-Chettu” programme for Repairs and Strengthening of protection wall of A.kodur supply channel near Sanjivarayudu Temple near A.kodur Village, Bandi Atmakur Mandal, Nandyala District, vide Agreement No.854 /2018-19, dated 02.07.2018. After execution of the said work, a final bill for Rs.9,66,016/- had been prepared and submitted to the concerned for payment. As the payment of the said amount has not been made by the respondents, the petitioner had approached this Court, by way of this writ petition.

¶4

It is the contention of the petitioner that even though the respondents admitted that the petitioner is entitled for payment of the aforesaid sum of money, no payment is being made. The petitioner contends that such non-payment of money is clearly arbitrary and high-handed requiring the interference of this Court.

¶5

¶6

This Court, in various orders, including the judgment of a learned Single Judge of this Court dated 05.10.2021 in W.P.No.10038 of 2021 and batch had taken the view that such non-payment of dues is arbitrary and that such dues need to be cleared by the respondents at the earliest.

¶7

The learned Government Pleader submits that the respondent authorities are verifying the claims of the petitioner and would be in a position to make payment only after such verification is completed.

¶8

In view of the aforesaid directions of this Court in various cases and after hearing the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Irrigation, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to complete the verification process within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and thereafter to pay the amount due to the petitioner depending upon the outcome of the verification, within a period of six weeks. It is clarified that in the event of the verification process not being completed within the aforesaid period of three weeks, the

¶9

¶10

respondents shall pay the amount due to the petitioner, without insisting upon any further time for verification. It would also be open to the petitioner to agitate his/her/their claim for interest, if any payable by the respondents, in an appropriate forum. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶11

As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

¶12

____________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J.

¶13

09.02.2023 BSM

¶14

¶15

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO

¶16

WRIT PETITION No.768 of 2023

¶17

09.02.2023

¶18

BSM

Vaddu Venkata Reddy v. the State of Ap

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vaddu Venkata Reddy v. the State of Ap

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Balaji Consructions Vs the State of Ap

Shaik Mulali Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

R.Ravindra Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

G Venkata Subbayya Vs the State of Ap

K Sreenivasulu Vs the State of Ap

Kollam Suvamaraju Vs the Sub Divisional Magistrate Court