Anne Sunil Kumar v. the State of Ap
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought refund of EMD and FSD for government work through Writ Petition 6593 of 2023 and Section 151 CPC application. Petitioner counsel stated bill was paid and nothing needed adjudication. Court closed the petition without costs.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition and miscellaneous application closed without costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AT AMARA’ (Special Original Jurisdiction) i O ' TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE » HgSZ
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 6593 OF 2023
Between:
Arine Sunil Kumar, S/o Anne Sambasiva Rao, Aged about 39 years, Occ: Civil Contractor, R/o H. No. 6-199, near Ganganamma temple, Pedavadlapudi, Mangalagiri Mandal, Guntur district 522302.
...PETITIONER
AND
- The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Department of Finance and Planning A.P Secretariat buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District.
- The Andhra Pradesh Comprehensive Financial Management system (CFMS), 6th floor, C block, Anjaneya Towers, Ibrahimpatnam, Krishna District, Rep. By its Chairman.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Arine Sunil Kumar
- respondent
The State of Andhra Pradesh
- respondent
The Andhra Pradesh Comprehensive Financial Management system
- respondent
The Andhra Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation
- respondent
The Superintending Engineer, Andhra Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Andhra Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/6593/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court