Dismissed

Sri Visweswaraiah Educational Society v. the University Grants Commission (Ugc)

Andhra Pradesh HC4 Jul 2023WP/5498/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravati, permitted the withdrawal of Writ Petition No. 5498 of 2023, which sought autonomous status for an educational institution, and dismissed the petition on that basis. No other miscellaneous applications were disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Permission was granted to withdraw the writ petition. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Sri Visweswaraiah Educational Society Vs the… — Education and Admissions | Andhra Pradesh HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶2

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

TUESDAY .THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

|wl

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI^^^^

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 5498 OF 2023

¶8

Between:

¶9

' Near.'power""sXn. CheS.’

¶10

2. SX SrS^^^^ S'®"®".

¶11

3. R.Manjula, \N/O. Dr.R.V.Krishnaiah. Aged About 48 Years .RMI 501, MIG-458, .XCO Road No-2. i/m KPHB ir^ a Colony. ... Hyderabad. *** RJO.D.No.Falat-**

¶12

...PETITIONER(S) AND

¶13

¶14

2. The University Grants Commission (UGC). Rep. by its Additional Secretarv Wing, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi

¶15

S7a Ea:tloXi dS

¶16

SLlnlanshaSaiglXTeSh? of Higher

¶17

...RESPONDENTS

¶18

226 Of the Constitutioh of India pravino that in the circumstances staled in the affidavit filed therewith the Htah Cniirt h! s“"t:s 17 uhconsWion: aTdtoXqSy'dl^rth/^sSenlTalf ’7 on7ardT.°“’ "'® P®''®"®' institution from academic year 2O2T23

¶19

lA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶20

in the Stoit circumstances stated affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may he pleased to

¶21

direct the respondent 1&2 to forth with take steps to grant autonomous status to the petitioner institution which was forwarded to 1®‘ respondent on 30.09.2022 and the reminder dated 18.02.2023, pending disposal of the writ petition before this Hon'ble court.

¶22

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. CHILUKURI NARENDRA BABU Counsel for the Respondents 1&2: PASALA PONNA RAO, SC FOR UGC

¶23

Counsel for the Respondent 3: SRI I. MADHU BABU

¶24

Counsel for the Respondent 4: SRI N.HARINATH, DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL

¶25

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶26

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

¶27

WRITPETITION NO.5498 OF 2023

¶28

ORDER;

¶29

Learned counsel for the petitioners, submitted that they filed a memo vide U.S.R. No.53433 of 2023, seeking permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and the .s.ame is placed on record. 2. Sri Pasala Ponna Rao, learned standing counsel for

¶30

respondents reported no objection.

¶31

Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as

¶32

withdrawn.

¶33

Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand

¶34

closed.

¶35

SD/- SHAIK MOHD. RAFI ASSISTANTAREGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER

¶36

To,

¶37

One CC to Sri. Chilukuri Narendra Babu Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri. Pasala Ponna Rao, SC for UGC Advocate {OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri. I. Madhu Babu, SC for UGC Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to Sri. N. Harinath, Deputy Solicitor General [OPUC] 5. Two CD Copies Sdkr AG

¶38

HIGH COURT DATED:04/07/2023

¶39

ORDER

¶40

WP.No.5498 of 2023

¶41

w'moul’S2S’ “*

Sri Visweswaraiah Educational Society v. the University Grants Commission (Ugc)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Visweswaraiah Educational Society v. the University Grants Commission (Ugc)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rechintala Vema Reddy Vs the State Information Commission

M/S. Sri Kodandarama Boiled and Raw Rice Mill Vs Union of India

M/S. Kpr Rice Mills Vs Union of India

Mogali Satyanarayana Reddy Vs M/S.Srinilayam

Anne Sunil Kumar Vs the State of Ap

Chireddy Konda Reddy Vs Gontu Koti Reddy