The High Court, Andhra Pradesh, in a writ petition concerning land acquisition under RLARR Act 2013, accepted the petitioner's submission that the cause did not survive and closed the petition as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
€*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TVVENTY THREE
4/W
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADfeSSt
WRIT PETITION NO: 4509 OF 2018
Between:
2.
AND
...PETITIONERS
...RESPONDENTS
s s “ii" ESS-." <" S No- «/2 -* Ac.1.3o’ceX43ra Ac 147 and anrf ' ^0.1.89, 43/A - Ac.0.34 cents, 40/1B - Ac 3 14 cents and ^2/1 - Ac.1.46, ^2I2K - Ac.3.29 cents, 42/2C-Ac.0.95 cents 40/3- Ac 0 70 ' A®-®-'*® 43/9A- Ac.0.22 cents, total Ac. 18 15 cents situated nnS^ Village, R.S. Kondapuram Mandal, Kadapa District by issuinq P'’°® No. 61/2865-2/2016 dt. 06.1.2017 unde? 30/2013 and consequential proceedings under Sec 19 (1) vide Proc No. 61/29765;2/2016 dt. 29.6.2017 of the® Right to Fair
Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act 2013 by the 3rd respondent is illegal, unconstitutional and ultra virus and violation of the Articles 14 and 300-A of Constitution of India and to pass
lA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to STAY all further proceedings of the 3^*’ respondent notice issued in Form No.6A vide Proc No. G1/2865-2/2016 dt. 06.1.2017 under Section 11 (1) of the Act 30/2013 and consequential proceedings under Sec 19 (1) vide Proc No. G1/29765-2/2016 dt. 29.6.2017 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act 2013 for acquisition of the petitioners agricultural lands situated in No.43/2 - Ac. 1.30 cents, 43/3 - Ac. 1.47 and 43/4 - Ac.3.23 cents, 43/5 - Ac. 1.89, 43/A - Ac.0.34 cents, 40/1B - Ac.3.14 cents and 42/1 - Ac.1.46, 42/2A - Ac.3.29 cents, 42/2C - Ac.0.95 cents, 40/3 - Ac.0.70 cents, 43/6A - Ac.0.16 cents, 43/9A- Ac.0.22 cents, total Ac. 18.15 cents situated at Old Kondapuram Village, R.S. Kondapuram Mandal, Kadapa District, pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. Y VENKATASATYAM
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 5: GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITON NQ.4509 OF 2018
ORDER;
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and learned counsel
for.the respondents.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that the cause in the present Writ Petition does i not survive and no further adjudication is necessary in the present Writ Petition. Therefore, the Writ Petition becomes infructuous.
Recording the said submission. Writ Petition is closed as
infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel. misceUaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand
closed.
%x
Sd/- B CHITTI JOSEPH ASSISTANT REGISTRY //TRUE COPY// ^SECTl6^'fel^ 1. One CC to SRI. Y VENKATASATYAM Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 3. Two CD Copies csb
I
HIGH COURT
DATED:08/08/2023
ORDER
WP.No.4509 of 2018
0 4 OCT 2S23 nsjt
CLOSING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
Chinta Pratap Reddy
The District Collector, Kadapa
Justices Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
