A petition challenging the non-disposal of a petition regarding burial and grazing lands was dismissed as the Court held that the matter was being adjudicated via a concurrent common order in a batch of PILs filed earlier.
The writ petition stands closed as infructuous owing to a common order passed in a batch of PILs filed for the same village.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ATAMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY ,THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
J
WRIT PETITION NO: 44718 OF 2017
Between:
Bussa Rajendra, Occ Advocate, High Court of TS and A.P. Hyderabad Permanent resident of Thumbapalyam Village and Post, Bangarupalyam Mandal, Chittoor District, A.P. 517416 and Temporarily residing at Flat No.201, H.No.8-3-231/W122, Surya Krishna Residency, Yousufguda, Hyderabad-500 045, T.S.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the 1St respondent for not considering and disposing of the petition filed by the petitioner dt.13.10.2017 for protecting the burial grounds, grazing lands and endowment lands situated at Thumbapalyam Gram Panchayat, Thumbapalyam Village and Post, Bangarupalyam Mandal, Chittoor District is illegal, arbitrary unconstitutional and consequently direct the 1St respondent to consider and dispose of the petition dt.13.10.2017 of the petitioner according to law.
IA NO: 1 OF 2017
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1St respondent to consider and dispose of the petition dt.13.10.2017 of the petitioner forthwith, pending disposal of the writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. S. VARADARAJULU CHETTY
Counsel for the Respondents 1 to 5: GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION No.44718 of 2O17
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner andlearned Government Pleader for Revenue.
Learned counsel for the petitionersubmitsthatthe petitioner herein filed W.P.(PIL).Nos.140of2022andbatch seeking same relief in respect of same villagewherein this Court passed the common order on14.09.2022.Inviewofthesame no further orders are required andthe the writpetition becomes infructuous.
In view of the above, the WritPetitionisclosedas infructuous.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any,pending in the writ petition shall stand closed.
To,
Sd/- N. NAGAMMA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// J1/SEdTIO~N OFFICER
Sdkr
HIGH COURT
DATED:04/08/2023
ORDER
WP.No.44718 of 2017
'lam\OF ANp/.~Rq
9
Q S CCT 2JZ3 ~ ~m
CLOSING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition filing for mandamus to compel the respondent to dispose of a petition regarding burial and grazing lands becomes infructuous due to a prior common order in a batch of PILs.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
BUSSA RAJENDRA
JOINT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR
COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER
TAHSILDAR, BANGARUPALYAM
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
