The single-judge High Court held that since nothing further survived on the facts, the writ petition filed in 2013 was infructuous and was dismissed with no order as to costs.
Writ Petition dismissed as infructuous; no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
WRIT PETITION No.29703 of 2013
ORDER:
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
nothing further survives in the matter and the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
____________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J
20.07.2023
MJA
2
71
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
WRIT PETITION No.29703 of 2013
20.07.2023
MJA
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition has become infructuous requiring dismissal.
R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
