A writ petition seeking mandamus against the inaction of the 2nd respondent in granting building permission was disposed of as no cause survived because building permission was granted under an interim order earlier passed.
The writ petition was disposed of with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY. THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JUNE O' TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE o
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN
WRIT PETITION NO: 2844 OF 2021
Between:
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development, A.P. Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, A.P.
2. The Kadapa Municipal Corporation, Rep. Commissioner, Kadapa city, YSR Kadapa district.
3. The Inspector Auditor Waqfs, YSR Kadapa District, Office at Collectorate Compound, YSR Kadapa, YSR Kadapa District
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the 2nd respondent for not granting the building permission on the application submitted by the petitioners vide B.A.NO.1013/1187/B/KAD/NGP/2018 dated 19.11.2018 for the construction of Stilt plus 4 floors at premises D.Nos.4/631, 4/631-1, 4/631-2, 4/631-3, 4/631-4, 4/631-5, 4/631-6, 4/631-7, 4/632 and 4-633 old bus stand, Nagarapalli, Nagaraju palle, Kadapa as clearly shown in the plan anhexure to the said application on the strength of the letter addressed by the 3rd respondent vide F.No. IAW/65/2004/KDP dated 02.08.2019 and the consequential endorsement issued by the 2nd respondent vide ROC.No.1478/G1/2018 dated 03.10.2020 is being
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Rta®.ho“u H® '’®'' "’® P™'''S'O"S O’ the A.P. Municipal Act, 1965 R/w. the Hyderabad Municipal Act, 1955.
Counsel for the Petitioner(s): SRI. SUBHANI S M
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV
SC FOR MUNICIPALRespondentsCORPORATION2 & 3 : SRI SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA'
The Court made the following: ORDER
4--
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN \ WRIT PETITION No.2844 of 2021 I
Sumermal Bhandari S/o. Hazarimal Ji, aged about 82 years, Occ:Senior Citizen, R/o.D.No. 13-60, Badarkhan Masjid Street, Kadapa City, Kadapa District and 3 others.
Petitioners
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development, A.P. Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, A.P and 2 others.
....Respondents
ORDER;
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the
learned Standing Counsel for the 2"’^ respondent.
2. In view of the interim orders passed by this Court dated 03.03.2021, the respondent authorities granted the Building Permission dated 27.12.2021 and as such no cause survives in
this matter.
3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall
be no order as to costs.
if
2
As a sequel. Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any,
shall stand closed.
Sd/- B.CHITTI JOSEPH
ASSISTANliEGIsfRAR
//TRUE COPY//
T-. SECTfON OFFICER
district Kadapa Municipal Corporation. Kadapa city, YSR Kadapa
a
= as-gg;
CORPOWTION [OPuTl SC FOR MUNICIPAL
^^7. Two CD Copies
HIGH COURT
DATED:21/06/2023
F
%
11 AUG 2023
ORDER
WP.No.2844 of 2021
KNgl,
DISPOSING OF WP WITHOUT COSTS
Sumermal Bhandari
B Sampath Kumar
Smt. Kalavathi
Smt. Asha Devi
State of Andhra Pradesh
Kadapa Municipal Corporation
B KRISHNA MOHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
