Single judge permitted withdrawal of a writ petition subject to liberty to file again. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive relief was granted beyond procedural permission.
Permission granted to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to file afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION No.27300 of 2023
Between:
Koda Polaiah Rao, Rep.by his father Koda Musalaiah @ Musalaiah Naidu.
.... Petitioners
And
Andhra Pradesh Grameena Vikas Bank, Rep. by its Chairman, Warangal & Others. .... Respondents
Counsel for the petitioners : Mr.Kale Vijaya Raju Counsel for the respondents : Notice un-served
ORDER:
Mr.Kale Vijaya Raju, learned counsel for the petitioners submits
that petitioners seek permission to withdraw the Writ Petition with a
liberty to file afresh.
Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is
dismissed as withdrawn, granting liberty as prayed for. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications, if any,
shall stand closed.
____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA, J.
Date: 21.11.2023. BLV
2
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
WRIT PETITION No.27300 of 2023
Date: 21.11.2023
BLV
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant the petitioners' permission to withdraw the Writ Petition with a liberty to file afresh.
Koda Polaiah Rao
Andhra Pradesh Grameena Vikas Bank
NINALA JAYASURYA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
