This matter was disposed of as the Writ Petition became infructuous. The Court dismissed the petition and closed the miscellaneous petitions without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION NO: 26192 OF 2015
Between:
Aman Showkath BEd, College, Sy.No.517, Issapalem Village, Narasaraopet Mandal, Guntur District. Rep. by its Secretary & Correspondent Sri SKSA. Hussain, S/o Vali aged 37 years.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 2^^ respondent in not granting ratification of the students admission that of the 3"'^ respondent for not granting affiliation to the students of B.Ed course for the academic year 2014-15 of petitioner college despite having formal recognition from NOTE as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the 2'^'^ respondent to grant ratification and the 3^ respondent to grant affiliation for B.Ed course for the year 2014-15 for the petitioner.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015rWPMP. NO: 34030 OF 20151
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the 3' respondent to issue hall tickets to the students of petitioner college for which examination are commencing from 25.08.2015.
I.A. NO: 2 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 34767 OF 20151
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
■>»
receive the list of the student submitted to the 2"'^ respondent and hall tickets up loaded to the respondent and notice to the managements issued by the 2 nd respondent as Addl. Material papers.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI Y. NAGI REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION
Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : SRI V. KISHORE
Counsel for the Respondent No.3 : SRI P. MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, SC FOR ANU
The Court made the following: ORDER
/»
HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION No.26192 of 201R
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up today, Mr.G. Mallikarjuna Reddy, counsel representing Mr.Y.Nagi Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive and the matter has become infructuous.
- Recording the said submission, this. Writ Petition IS dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending. if any, in this Writ
Petition shall stand closed.
Sd/- P.VINOD KUMAR ASSISTAN TRAR //TRUE COPY// (\ SEC in
To,
HIGH COURT
DATED:12/12/2023
ORDER
WP.No.26192 of 2015
7^
DISMISSING THE W.P. AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
Aman Showkath BEd College
The State of Andhra Pradesh
The Andhra Pradesh state counsel for Higher Education
Acharya Nagarjuna University
V. SUJATHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
