This judgment dismisses a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution and a miscellaneous application as infructuous. The court accepted the petitioner's counsel's submission that nothing remained for further adjudication.
The writ petition and miscellaneous application were dismissed as infructuous with no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
IgUWlhl
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION NO: 21896 OF 2015
Between: Smt. Potnuri Sri Devi, D/o.Late P.Prakasha Rao, Age: 39 years,Occ: Service, R/o.Betani Charch, Data Sai Nagar Vadlapucli,Visakhapatnam- 530 046.
...PETITIONER
AND
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring.the proceedings issued in F.No.7-1/ 2012 /NLM-II, date 01.05.2015 by 2"‘‘ Respondent for Reconstitution of Board of Management of 4 Respondent proceedings based upon panel of names sent by respondent 4 and 5 with their interested personal as wholly illegal, unconstitutional. Arbitrarily, unjust, untenable, viod non-est under Law and further direct the 1®‘ and 2"^ respondent to keep Board of Management reconstituted on 01.05.2015 in abeyance duly taking into consideration of representation dt 13.05.2015 until enquiry into irregularities of Board as per letter of 2nd respondent date 13.01.2015 and pending investigation of Crime Registered based upon the letter date 13,12.2014 is completed.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015fWPMP. NO: 28205 OF 2015)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that'in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent to keep the Board of Management of 4*’’ Respondent Sansthan in abeyance till enquiry as per letter date 13.01.2015 of the 2"*^ respondent pending investigation of Criminal cases Registered based upon the letter dt 13.12.2014 duly taking into consideration of representation dt. 13.05.2015 pending disposal of the Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner(s): SRI. SRINIVASA RAO PUTLURI
Counsel for the Respondents 1 to 5 : SRI HARINATH N, DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA
The Court made the following: ORDER
,1
THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE V. SUJATHA
Writ Petition No.21896 of 2015
ORDER:
When the matter was taken up for hearing today, Sri Srinivasa Rao Putluri, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing survives for further adjudication, and therefore, the matter has become infructuous.
shall also stand closed.
Sd/- M.SRINIVAS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR IllRUEZQPyil SECTII OFFICER
I
. 3. Two CD Copies MSR
A
HIGH COURT
DATED: 12/04/2023
ORDER
r.'
flp '^’1
"" */
WP.No.21896 of 2015
'X
DISMISSING OF WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the reconstitution of the Board of Management of Jana Shikshan Sansthan had survived for adjudication.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Smt. Potnuri Sri Devi
Union of India
Jana Shikshan Sansthan
V. SUJATHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
