The High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravati, allowed the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition and dismissed it as withdrawn, making no order as to costs.
Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn; no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY. THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
's li
|5
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION NO: 2113 OF 202?
Between:
C Late Gangaiah Aged abuuiabout 53 years. Occ - Office Padirikuppam. Annu7,karv’eiinagamm, CwSrict.'^®'S.4?Pension) D.“•
...PETITIONER
AND
Triupathi Devasthanam, Tirupathi, Chitoor
Devasthanam. Tirupathi.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India pravino that in thP Stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be Wrrt A? M *^''’®ction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents No.2 and 3 ?n DaT/205V202Vdt 30 09 Memorandum vide ROC No. Riiioc -IQQ4 at30.09.2021 as illegal arbitrary and in violation of the APCCA asiriP ^S^inst all settled principles of law and consequently to setDA1/2051/2027dt30.09'.?02T'°" ROC No.
-.5
lA NO: 1 OF 2079
in the affiS ?PC praying that in thexircumstances stated Sav Ihl^one '".®“PP°rt of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to d 3^) 0^021 suspension Memo in RO® No. DA1/2051/2021 ai.du.U9.2021, pending disposal of the mam Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI. KALLA TULASI DURGAMBA
Counsel for the Respondents: SMT.A SUMANTH ( SC FOR TTD)
The Court made the following: ORDER
I
~ • ■
I
f
r
I
i
I
!
j....
4
I-
i
j....
ZJ
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V. SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION No.2113 of 2022-
ORDER:-
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition and endorsed the same on the bundle to that effect.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
There shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending.
shall stand closed.
SB- P- VINOD KUMAR assBtant registrar //TRUE COPY// ! SECTION OFFICER ’l One CC to SRI KALLA TULASI DURGAMBA Advocate^PUC] 2. One CC to SRI A SUMANTH ( SC FOR TTD) Advocate [QPUC] 3. Two CD Copies GSR V
1..-'
I
'V
GSR
HIGH COURT
DATED:29/08/2023
ORDER
WP.No.2113 of 2022
x: B 9 OCT
ioespKfSj^
THE WRIT PETITION IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN
C Late Gangaiah
Triupathi Devasthanam
V. SUJATHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
