Petitioner sought to withdraw a writ petition challenging a notification under the Andhra Pradesh Urban Land Ceiling Act. The High Court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Permitted withdrawal of writ petition; dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 19364 OF 2022
Between:
Akkineni Rajeswari, W/o. Late D Venkata Subbarao Aged about 74 years, Flat No.203, White Rose Apartments O.Lane, Vijayapuri Colony, J.K.C. College Road, Pattabhipuram, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh - 522006.
/
...PETITIONER
AND
/
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order, writ or direction more particularly in the nature of Mandamus declaring the notification dated 18.02.2006 issued under section 10 (6) of the Act 33 of 1976 as being illegal in view of non service of section 10(5) notice on the owner and possessor of the property and to consequently declare that the section 22-A notification issued by Respondent No.1 in G.O.Ms No.1395 dated 28.11.2008 and the consequential proceedings in R.C. No. 05/2022-ULC dated 02.03.2022 issued by District collector, Guntur, as being without jurisdiction, arbitrary and illegal, and to further direct the Respondent No.5 to remove his subject property from the list of prohibited properties.
lA NO: 2 OF 2023
Petition under Rule 12(2)(3) of WP Rules 1977 R/w Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to the petitioner to file its reply affidavit.
lA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Rule 12(ii)(iii) of WP Rules 1977 R/w Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Grant leave to the petitioner to file its reply affidavit. lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No. 5 to allow any registration instruments with respect to the subject property by suspending the
operation of G.O.Ms.No.1395 dated 28.11.2008 of Respondent No.1 pending the disposal of the present Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner(s): SRI. P SRI RAM
Counsel for the Respondents 1 to 5 : THE ADDL ADVOCATE GENERAL
The Court made the following: ORDER
1
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
WRIT PETITION No. 19364 of 2022
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for consideration, Sri P.Sri Ram, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that, subsequent to filing of the Writ Petition, the Government had issued G.O.Ms.No.84,dated 24.02.2023 and the petitioner intends to proceed for regularization inaccordancewiththesaidG.O. and he has instructions from the petitioner to withdrawtheWritPetition.
As sequel thereto, miscellaneous petition, if any, pending shall stand closed. Interim orders, if any, shall stand vacated.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/- P.VINOD KUMAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER
To,
Madhu
HIGH COURT
DATED:30/10/2023
ORDER
WP.No.19364 of 2022
I II6 JUN 2024 Sj]
Current Senllon
DISMISSING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
Akkineni Rajeswari
The State of Andhra Pradesh
Ravi Cheemalapati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
