The petitioner in a writ petition challenging the forfeiture of earnest money prayed for withdrawal of the petition before the High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravati.
Permission granted to withdraw; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEM®^^WM
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE 'Iz:: I 7 S'
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
WRIT PETITION NO: 14074 OF 2014
Between:
P.V. Subba Raju, Son of Sri Radhakrishnam Raju, Occupation: Agriculture Resident of Dumpagadapa Post, Akiveedu Mandai, West Godavari District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the highhanded action of the respondents in forfeiting the EMD amount to the tune of Rs.7,30,000/- under the proceedings dated 30.03.2012 of the 2"" respondent without any fault of the petitioner, that too by suppressing the real litigation that took place between the borrowers and the Bank as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, malafide, without proper application of mind contrary to the rights guaranteed under Constitution of India and consequently,’ D 2 & 3 to refund the EMD amount to the tune of H petitioner with interest by setting aside the proceedings dated 30.03.2012 of the 2^ respondent.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 17539 OF 2014)
♦K .Z® 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to D ^7 2 & 3 to refund the EMD amount to the tune of Rs.7,30,000/- to the petitioner with interest, pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI CHAKRADHARA RAJA Y Counsel for the Respondents: SRI SREEDHAR VALIVETI,
SC FOR INDIAN BANK
The Court made the following: ORDER
4
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATHI
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
WRIT PETITION No. 14074 of 2014
P.V.SubbaRaju
Petitioner
And
Indian Bank, Rep. by its Chairman Cum Managing Director Corporate Office, PB No.5555, 254-260, Avvai Shanmugam Salai, Royapettah, Chennai-600 014. & two others Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Mr.Y.Chakradhara Raja Counsel for respondents : Sreedhar Valiveti
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of
this Court to withdraw the writ petition.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall
stand closed.
Sd/- A.VIJAYA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SEi OFFICER 1. One CC to Sri Chakradhara Raja Y., Advocate [OPUCl 2. Thre^C D c"' Valiveti, SC for Indian Bank [OPUC] 3. Cnr
To,
4
**
HIGH COURT
DATED;22/11/2023
ORDER
WP.No.14074 of 2014
2 5 NOV 223 “g
. Current Section .
So^co™””' “
PUk
P.V. Subba Raju
Indian Bank
Ninala Jayasurya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
