Petitioner sought notional seniority and promotional benefits denied by State of Andhra Pradesh. Counsel moved to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh.
Withdrawal of the writ petition allowed. Liberty to file fresh writ petition granted. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATU (Special Original Jurisdiction) /zv-
/zv-
o
\V 'PSj
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBEF&/lj
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
WRIT PETITION NO: 1190 OF 2022
Between:
Ravada Eswara Rao, S/o.Ramu, Aged about 48 years, Occ. P.G.T Economics in A.P. Model School, R/o. B.N.Peta, Vepada Mandal Vizianagaram District. Andhra Pradesh. ...PETITIONER
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be nature o wrirnf m partioularly one in the no nfanli,!! ' r ‘’V declaring that the action of theRespondents in not granting notional seniority to me with effect from 19.06.2013 in the cost of dMR nft 9017^®' W.P.No.14107/2016 14 16 ^6 r unconstitutional and violative of Article to pass orLTorlrSinn^M t consequently direct the Respondents °om 19 6 201 rTap H f effect with (AP Model School, Perumali, Therlam Mandal, Vizianagaram) withpromotionall consequentialwith effect frombenefitsthe notionalincludingdate ofarrearsmy appointmen/inof salary theseniorityinllsrofand lA NO: 1 OF 2099 stated in thrardlti,f?‘^‘°" circumstances n pIcTph t ^ tj'led in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be from 19 06 20T3 to consider my case for placement witheffect treating me as Principal from the said date and accordinqiv consider my representation dt.03.09.2021 in the interest of Justice. ^ ^
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. G SEENA KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: GP FOR SERVICES I
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2 &3: GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION The C^urt made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
WRIT PETITION No. 1190 OF 2022
ORAL ORDER;
Sri G. Seena Kumar, Learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner would submit that in view of the subsequent developments, the Writ Petitioner has requested thecounsel by letter dated 19.12.2023 to withdraw this Writ Petition, with liberty to file afresh Writ Petition. Accordingly, the Counsel for the Writ Petitioner has also filed a Letter in the Registry dated 27.12.2023. Both the Letters are taken on record.
- Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition, if so advised. No order as to costs.
- Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order.
SDI- U. SRIDEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
To.
SECTION OFFICER
MBT
HIGH COURT
DATED: 28/12/2023
ORDER
WP.No.1190 of 2022
f/C
.3: cjY»
(3 21 MAY 2024
Cr/;
^ Current Se.-^tion .
%^TCV!S§^
DISMISSING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
gj:c^
RAVADA ESWARA RAO
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
