Y Sandeep v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
Case brief
What is this about?
In this writ petition, the petitioner sought a writ of mandamus for harassment, non-payment of salary, and illegal termination. Upon finding that the grievance was redressed by a referral order dated 15.12.2023, the court closed the petition without costs.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition closed; no order as to costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
m
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
WRIT PETITION NO: 32904 OF 2023
Between:
Y. Sandeep, S/o. late Appala Raju, Aged about 38 years, Occ: Senior Assistant, District Collector Office, Visakhapatnam District, R/o. D.No. 9-466/1, Sanjeeva Nagar Colony, Near Ravi Clinical Lab, Visalakshi Nagar Post, Chinagadali Mandal, Visakapatnam District-530 043. ...PETITIONER
AND
- The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, GunturDistrict.
- The Chief Commissioner of Land Administration, 1®‘ 3'^' Floor, APIIC Towers, Plot Number 01, IT Park, Mangalagiri, Guntur District.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should issue a writ of mandamus directing the revenue authorities to conduct an enquiry against the Respondent for harassment and non-payment of salary.
Whether the representation of the petitioner to conduct an enquiry against the 6th Respondent has been redressed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Y. Sandeep
- respondent
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department
- respondent
The Chief Commissioner of Land Administration
- respondent
The District Collector, Visakhapatnam
- respondent
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Vishakhapatnam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Andhra Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/32904/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court