In Second Appeal No. 1158 of 2008, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati summarily dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution. The Court noted that the appellants failed to appear or represent themselves on the matter, leading to the withdrawal of the proceedings.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AWIARAVATI
V
FRIDAY ,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
SECOND APPEAL NO: 1158 OF 2008
Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C, aggrieved by judgment and decree of the learned II Additional District Judge, Ongole dated 24-02-2006 delivered in A.S.No.40 ; of 2003, reversing the judgment and decree of the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Ongole, delivered in O.S.No.103 of 2000 dated 05-03-2003.
Between:
2. Smt. Kamepalli Indiranmma, W/o Sita Ramaiah, Hindu, Aged 48 years, R/o Mangamur Village, S.N.Padu Mandal, Ongole District.
3. Kamepalli Sesha Rao, S/o Sita Ramaiah, Hindu, Aged 31 years, R/o Mangamur Village, S.N.Padu Mandal, Ongole , District.
4. Kamepalli Raghava Rao, S/o Sita Ramaiah, Hindu, Aged 28 years, R/o Mangamur Village. S.N.Padu Mandal, Ongole, District.
1. Nalluri Krishna Mohan Rao, S/o Venkata Narayana ,Hindu. Aged 65 years,R/o Mangamuru, S.N.Padu Mandal, Prakasam District.
s.
...RESPONDENT/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF
LA. NO: 3 OF 2008(SAMP. NO: 2592 OF 2008)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the decree and judgment delivered in AS No.40/2003 on the file of the court of the learned II Addl. District Judge's Court, Ongole, dated 24.01.2006.
Counsel for the Appellants: SRI VSR ANJANEYALU
Counsel for the Respondent: SRI. NAGA PRAVEEN VANKAYALAPATI
The Court made the following:
1 1 I I
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
SECOND APPEAL No. 1158 of 2008
JUDGMENT;
The proceedings dated 30.08.2023 shows that there was no representation on either side and the matter is posted to 14.09.2023. On that day i.e., on 14.09.2023, there
was no representation on behalf of the appellants.
Even though the matter is listed today under the caption Tor dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants. Therefore, the appellants are not inclined to
prosecute the case.
Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
No costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending.
shall stand closed.
Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
y^UEC^Tfefr^FICER
’l. The Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Ongole (with records if any) 2. The Court of The li Additional District Judge, Ongole (with records if any) 3. One CC to Sri V. S. R. Anjaneyalu, Advocate [OPUCl
4 One CC to Sri Naga Praveen Vankayalapati, Advocate [OPUC]
Cnr
MV
HIGH COURT
DATED: 15/09/2023
JUDGMENT
SA.No.1158 of 2008
’ S 0 7 OCT 2023 d
S.A IS DISMISSED FOR NON- PROSECUTION
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second Appeal before this Court should be allowed or dismissed in the absence of representation by the appellants.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kamepalli Sitaramaiah
Smt. Kamepalli Indiranmma
Kamepalli Sesha Rao
Kamepalli Raghava Rao
Nalluri Krishna Mohan Rao
V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
