The single judge dismissed a civil revision petition under Article 226 challenging an order regarding land transfer, noting the petition was withdrawn by the petitioner after raising laches issues spanning over 12 years.
The civil revision petition was dismissed as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous petitions were closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3085 OF 2023
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India aggrieved by the order dated 12/08/2011 in C.M.A.No.37 of 2007 on thefileoftheCourtofthe Additional Agent to the Government, Rampachodavaram,EastGodavariDistrict.
Between:
Kalimkota Kannayamma, D/o.late Valasayya, aged about 73yrs..caste by Kammari (ST), Senior Citizen, Rajavommangi (V) and (Mdl.)East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh. ...PETITIONER
AND
(All the respondents are non-tribals and residentsofRajavommangi(village and Mandal), East Godavari District, A.P.)
...Respondents
lA NO: 2 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstancesstated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to stay all the constructions which are in progress in the P.S. Land by the respondents and their agents and nominees in the scheduled land.
Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri M. Jaya Prakash for Sri Anumula Vamsi Krishna
Counsel for the Respondents 1 to 13:-
The Court made the following: ORDER
/
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 3085 of 2023
JUDGMENT:
Sri M. Jaya Prakash, learned counsel, representingSriAnumulaVamsi Krishna, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the revision petition
has been wrongly filed and the petitioner wants to withdraw the petition.
about more than 12 years in filing the petition.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed in
consequence.
To.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/- B. PRASADA RAO ASSISTANT R^(|4STRAR
SECTION OFFICER
ssb
HIGH COURT
DATED: 19/12/2023
ORDER
CRP.No.3085 of 2023
DISMISSING THE CRP AS WITHDRAWN
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the revision petition filed under Article 226 should be set aside due to laches.
Whether the civil revision petition withdrawing the matter should be allowed.
4 provisions across 4 enactments
Kalimkota Kannayamma
Adduri Veera Venkata Satyanarayanaraju
Adduri Rajababu
Adduri Ananda Bala Bhaskara raju
Adduri Ramakrishna Raju
Muwala Krishna
Ravi Nath Tilhari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
