The High Court dismissed a criminal petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C seeking quashment of criminal proceedings as the petitioner did not appear for opposition, evincing no interest in prosecuting the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6695 OF 2018
Between:
Veluri Sanath Kumar, S/o. Sanjeeva Naidu, Aged about 44 years, Occ; Business, R/o D. No.25-1-1073 ,Flour Mill Center, Podalakuru Road , Nellore ...Petitioner AND
...Respondents
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that inthecircumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the C.C.No.220 of 2016 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of I Class Special Mobile Court, Ongole.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceeding in C.C. No 220 of 2016 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of I Class Special Mobile Court, Ongole, Prakasam District.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusingtheMemorandumof Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the argumentsofSri Sri Rama Krishna Thokala, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and None appeared for the Respondent No.2.
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.6695 OF 201«
ORDER;
Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For Dismissal”, there has no representation for the petitioner and, therefore, it evinces that the petitioner has no interest in prosecuting the case.
Hence, the Criminal Petition is dismissed for nonprosecution.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications, pending if any mi this case, shall stand closed.
SD/- U. SRIDEVI ASSISTANTjREGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// C SECTlONOO F FICER
ssb
S)4t
HfGH COURT
DATED:06/12/2023
ORDER
CRLP.No.6695 of 2018
?-Co|% aalaiaif DSL
OF
O
. o
I 2 5 APR 202^1 m
★
DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION PROSECUTION
FOR NON
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Veluri Sanath Kumar
The State of Andhra Pradesh
Jellalamudi Hanumantyha Rao
Tarlada Rajasekhara Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
