Criminal Petition filed to quash proceedings for serious offences was dismissed. The Court allowed dispensation of the petitioner's presence during trial due to his official employment, contingent on appearing when directed.
Petitioner's presence dispensed with for trial; Criminal Petition dismissed; Pending interlocutory applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.3064 OF 2019
ORDER:
The present Criminal Petition is filed to quash the proceedings against the petitioner/A8 in Sessions Case No.115 of 2016 on the file of the XIII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam District.
2
As a sequel, interlocutory applications, pending if any in this case, shall stand closed.
________________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 06.12.2023
siva
3
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.3064 OF 2019
Date: 06.12.2023
siva
1 issue framed by the court
Whether Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. can be dismissed despite allegations of serious offences under Sections 120B, 302 and 201 I.P.C.
Petitioner/A8
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
