Dismissed
Smt. Suthi Archana v. The State of A.P.
Andhra Pradesh HCCRLP/4542/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY ,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER | TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE \
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4542 OF 2018
Between:
Smt. Suthi Archana, W/o Ramaprasad, aged about 37 years, R/o. Flat No 102, Sumo Sai Residency Apts, Nizam pet Road, Kukatpally, Hyderabad. ...Petitioner/Accused No.4
AND
...Respondents
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated m the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash against the Petitioner/Accused A-4 in CC No. 132 of 2018 on the file of Hon’ble Addl. Judicial First Class Magistrate, Tuni and pleased to pass
LA. NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Stay all further proceedings in CC No. 132 of 2018 on the file of Addl. Judicial First Class Magistrate, Tuni against the Petitioner/Accused A-4 including appearance, pending disposal of Criminal Petition, and pleased to pass.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandumof Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri YOGESH KUMAR HEROOR ,Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and none appeared for the Respondent No.2 & 3
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.4542 OF 2018
ORDER;
Despite the matter being posted under the caption “for
dismissal”, there is no representation for the petitioner today.
Therefore, it evinces that the petitioner has no interestfor prosecuting the case.
Accordingly, the present Criminal Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pendinginthis
criminal petition shall stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/- A VENUGOPALA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR to
SECTION OFFICER
To
«-•
HIGH COURT
DATED: 13/12/2023
ORDER
CRLP.No.4542 of 2018
DIMISSING THE CRLP FOR NON-PROSECUTION
(\L
Smt. Suthi Archana
The State of A.P.
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court