In a petition to quash charges under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the High Court dismissed the matter as infructuous because the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submitted that the dispute was settled before the Lok Adalat.
Criminal Petition No. 1185 of 2019 dismissed as infructuous due to settlement at Lok Adalat.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1185 OF 2019
Between:
AND
...Respondent
...Respondent/De-facto Complainant
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the charge sheet in CC No.713/2018onthefileoftheCourt of the Additional Junior Civil Judge cum Judicial First Class Magistrate Bapatia for the offences under sections 323, 509 r/w Section 34 of IPC in respect of Crime No.271 of 2018 of Bapatia Town Police Station in so far as the petitioner/Accused are concerned in the interest of justice.
I.A. NO: 2 OF 2019
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that inthecircumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in CC.No.713/2018onthefileofthe
coujt pf th© Additional Junior Civil Judg© cum Judicial First Class Magistrato, Bapatia including arrest, pending disposal of the above Quash petition.
-ir
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the interim order expired on dated 22.1.2020 in Crl.P.No.1185 of 2019, pending disposal of the above Quash Petition in the interest of justice.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri A Muneendhar Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and none appeared for the Respondent No.2.
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION No. 1185 OF 2019
ORDER;
Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submitted that the matter was settled before the Lok Adalat in the District Court.
In view of the said submission, the present Criminal
Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pendinginthis
Criminal Petition shall stand closed.
/
SD/-B PRASADA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
To,
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Pmg
sree
SECTION OFFICER
Bap^lt^ Gm?ur Class Magistrate Court at ^apatla Town Police Station. Guntur District. One CC to Sri. A Muneendhar Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] Two CD^CopiesProsecutor, High Court of A.P. at Amaravathi[OUT]
y
HIGH COURT
DATED:14/12/2023
ORDER
CRLP.No.1185 of 2019
0
ZO
o a-
‘■'.x tL
) 6 APR MA Cj
*
v -k -kyj
.- •>
DISMISSING THE CRLP AS INFRUCTUOUS
9 Copies P{^i~
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is maintainable when the matter has been settled before the Lok Adalat.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bandi Koteswara Rao
Nandhyala Venkata Subrahmanyam
The State of Andhra Pradesh
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
