In a contempt petition alleging disobedience of an earlier High Court order, the contemnors represented they had paid the amount and complied. Accepting their submission of a compliance report, the Court closed the contempt case and miscellaneous pending applications.
Contempt case closed; pending miscellaneous applications also closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
FRIDAY ,THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 975 OF 2023
Between:
Cache Peripherals Pvt Ltd, Rep by its Director Gumidelli Sailesh, S/o. G. Mohan Rao, aged about 54 years, Regd. Office at 61-9/5-3, Ummidisetti Koteswara Rao Street. New Screw bridge, Poorna Chandra Nagar, Krishna Lanka, Vijayawada, NTR District, A.P.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
...CONTEMNORS/RESPONDENTS
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to take cognizance of the contempt committed by the Contemnors/Respondents herein and punish (hem with maximum imprisonment under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 r/w Article 215 of the Constitution of India for utter disobedience and disregard shown to the Order passed by the Hon'ble A.P. High Court dated 13.12.2022 passed in W P No 36482 of 2022.
Counsel for the Petitioner(s): Sri SRINIVASA RAO NARRA
Counsel for the Respondents 1 & 3: Sri N ASWARTHA NARAYANA
Counsel for the Respondent 2 : Sri V. Ashok Ram
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE K. MANMADHA RAO
CONTEMPT CASE No.975 OF 2023
ORDER;
Both the counsel are present.
It is represented by the learned counsel for the respondents/ contemnors that pursuant to the orders of this Court, the respondents/ contemnors paid the total amount to the petitioner and further submitted that the orders arp complied with as per instructions of the respondents, in proof of the same he placed on record the compliance report of the Superintending Engineer, DAC, O/o C&DA, Guntur, dated 03.08.2023, Hence, requested to record the same and close the Contempt Case.
Recording the submissions of learned counsel, the
Contempt Case is closed.
The miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also
stand closed.
SD/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
z
HIGH COURT
SRWl
DATED:04/08/2023
ORDER
•Si,.
CC.No.975 of 2023
CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to adjudicate contempt for alleged non-compliance where the contemnors claim compliance via report.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Cache Peripherals Pvt Ltd
Y Madhusudhan Reddy
Shamsher Singh Rawat
Chevuri Harikiran
K. MANMADHA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
