M/s. Bamsm Constructions, v. Sri Shamsheer Singh Rawat
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt case, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh noted that the impugned order in the original writ petition had been complied with. Consequently, the court closed the contempt proceedings without costs.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed; no order as to costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAV/i
WEDNESDAY ,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY/q TWO THOUSAND ANO TWENTY THREE n 8l
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5354 OF 2022
Contempt case U/s. 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondents herein for wilfully violating , disobeying the orders of the Hiqh Court dated 19.09.2022 in WP No. 29127 of 2022.
Between:
M/s. Bamsm Constructions, Rep.by its Managing Partner. B.AIeem Miah S/o.B.Sukhur Miah, Office at H.No.44/18-G-1. Vishwa Apartments, Prakash Nagar, Kurnool, Kurnool District,
...Petitioner
AND
- Sri Shamsheer Singh Rawat, The State of Andhra Pradesh , Rep. by its Principal Secretary. Finance and Planning Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M/s. Bamsm Constructions
- respondent
Sri Shamsheer Singh Rawat
- respondent
The State of Andhra Pradesh
- respondent
The Andhra Pradesh Education and Welfare Infrastructure Development Corporation (APEWIDC)
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Andhra Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- CC/5354/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court