B v. Subbareddy v Praveen Prakash,I.a.S
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt petition filed for willful disobedience of a 2023 order, the petitioner contended that the respondents had complied. The court accepted the submission and closed the case without costs.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case is closed. No order as to costs.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER^ TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT \CL o
O
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI V
V
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4561 OF 2023
Between:
Balasubba reddy, Aged about 62 years, Occ; Contractor, R/o. D. No. 15-27, Guptha Nagar, Badvel, YSR Kadapa District.
...PETITIONER
AND
'
- Vijayaramraj, The District Collector, Kadapa, YSR Kadapa District
- ’■ s=5a: sx.zs'SSii'is,s: srs„
- S.S. Rawath, IAS, The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep bv its Prinrinai
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petitioner is entitled to closure of the case on submission of compliance without any order on costs.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Balasubba reddy
- respondent
Vijayaramraj
- respondent
S.S. Rawath
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Andhra Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CC/4561/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court